Showing posts with label history. Show all posts
Showing posts with label history. Show all posts

15 November 2009

British Withdrawal From Singapore

Singapore faced many challenges in its early years of independence, one of which was the British withdrawal by the end of 1971. This development was well-documented in various media:

Singapore - From Settlement to Nation Pre-1819 to 1971

A further challenge came about when the British announced that it would be withdrawing its military forces from Singapore by the end of 1971. At that time, British military expenditure amounted to 12.7% of Singapore's Gross National Product (GNP). Read what Dr. Toh Chin Chye, the then Deputy Prime Minister, said about the British withdrawal in 1968:

"Besides 30,000 civilian workers employed in the military bases being faced with the possibility of losing their jobs, there would be hundreds more who would be affected because their business and their livelihood depend on supplying goods and services to the British servicemen living in Singapore." (Adapted from The Straits Times, 1 Jan 1968, a New Year message by Dr. Toh Chin Chye.)

Other than the economic impact, the withdrawal also meant that Singapore now had to build up its own defence to protect the nation from both internal and external threats. Without securing political and social stability, it would not be possible for economic development to take off.


Singapore - Journey into Nationhood

In July 1967, Britain dropped a bombshell on Singapore: it would pull out all its troops by 1968. At least £50 million or close to 20 per cent of Singapore's economy came from the British military presence. Nearly one family in ten depended on the troops for its livelihood. There were some 30,000 civilian workers in the bases. Thousands of women worked as domestic helpers. Shops, restaurants and bars depended on the patronage of soldiers and their families. Singapore was facing a major economic crisis as well as a security one. The presence of British troops meant a minimum of precious funds had to be spent on defence.

Negotiations in London led to agreement that troop withdrawals would be phased out and completed by the mid-1970s. However, Britain went back on the agreement and in January 1968 said that withdrawal was to be completed by 31 December 1971. This was an extension by nine months of the original March deadline, reached after some desperate negotiations. To soften the blow, the British threw in all the bases and their facilities to which they had title, as a gift.

A Bases Economic Conversion Department was set up to look into commercial uses for these assets. The three Royal Air Forces bases alone covered some 2,428 hectares of land. The naval bases had potential as shipyards.

The nine extra months gave Singapore a little more time to make the changes necessary to meet the economic crisis. To prevent a recession, urban renewal was accelerated, industrialisation speeded up and infrastructure projects carried out in order to spend $900 million, the amount the British military would have spent between 1968 and 1971. The Singapore Armed Forces was expanded which also settled the question of security as well as increased jobs. So frantic was the pace of economic development that by the time the British completed their pull-out in 1971, Singapore was moving towards full employment.


Singapore - The Encyclopedia


In January 1968, the British government announced that it would pull out its troops in Singapore (and Malaysia) by spring 1971. This sudden and unexpected news shocked the Singapore government as it had been given to understand that the British would defend Singapore after its independence. Apart from security issues, the move would also affect the economy - at least 20 per cent of Singapore's economy then came from the presence of British military personnel. About 10 per cent of the working population depended on the troops for its livelihood. There were about 25,000 civilian workers in the bases. Thousands of women worked as domestic helpers and many shops depended on the patronage of British soldiers. British services spending in Singapore was as much as $550 million a year at the height of the Confrontation in Malaysia. In short, Singapore was facing a major economic crisis in addition to physical insecurity.

During defence talks with British leaders in London, Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew told reporters that he would forgo economic aid in return for security for Singapore and would have to hire mercenaries to defend Singapore if Britain pulled out its forces too quickly. The British agreed that the withdrawal of troops would be phased and completed only by mid 1970s to facilitate major cuts in Britain's armed forces and overseas defence spending. However, the British later changed their mind and informed Singapore that the withdrawal was to be completed by November 1971.

To fill the vacuum that followed the ending of the Anglo-Malayan Defence Agreement (AMDA), the British proposed the Five-Power Defence Arrangements (FPDA) made up of the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, Malaysia and Singapore, that would be consultative, not a binding defence obligation. On 31 October 1971, AMDA was replaced by FPDA.


Photos from National Archives of Singapore


27 April 1967 - British Defence Secretary Denis Healey at a press conference held at Phoenix Hotel. He announced that British troop withdrawal from the Far East is targetted at 20,000 before April 1968



1972 - Preceding 3 photos show Changi Cinema and shops in Changi Village. Changi, the last area in Singapore to see the British forces pull-out, is in the throes of transition today. With the Royal Air Force (RAF) troops out and the British withdrawal completed they could expect the going to be rough temporarily but it has a prosperous future as neighbouring Bedok will be the site of a new satellite town, the fourth in the republic.


Finally, Dr Loh Kah Seng is writing a book on the British bases and military withdrawal from Singapore. (Please see his open letter below.) If you or anyone you know have any stories to share, please get in touch with him. You can find out more information from his blog.

Dear fellow Singaporeans

I am a Singaporean historian looking to speak to people who remember the British bases and their withdrawal in the early 1970s. The withdrawal was the first major crisis independent Singapore faced. The 56 bases, contributing a fifth of the country’s GDP, were its largest industry, and the pullout threatened the livelihood of one-sixth of the labour force, including an estimated 8,000 amahs.

The pullout also transformed the economy, society and landscape of Singapore in the 1970s. Most of the bases were converted to commercial use, while many base workers underwent a 3-month retraining crash course. Technical and vocational education also expanded, as new laws sought to increase labour productivity and attract foreign capital investment.

These developments resonate with us today: the retraining programmes, the mobilisation of the young, the philosophy that ‘no one owes Singapore a living’. There is also a forgotten social history to unearth: how retrenched base employees coped with the crisis and how workers adjusted to new work routines.

If you remember the British bases and rundown, or have a family member, relative or friend who does, kindly contact me to lend your voice to an important episode of our national story.

Please pass this message along to those who might be interested.

Thank you.

Loh Kah Seng (Dr)
Visiting Research Fellow
Institute of Southeast Asian Studies,
Singapore
Email: LKSHIS@GMAIL.COM
Mobile: +65 81981172
Blog: Click here


Further Reading:

1. Infopedia: British Withdrawal from Singapore;

2. Wikipedia: History of the Republic of Singapore

3. Mindef Singapore: 1968 - British Withdrawal

20 December 2008

Does This Rock Look Familiar?


This quiz should be an easy one for YG. At different times, he came across to me as an entomologist (insect expert), an ornithologist (bird expert) or a botanist (plant expert). I believe YG's former profession as a teacher has something to do with his wide knowledge of diversified topics, except perhaps only in investment. :p Obviously, YG made a very good teacher.

So far, YG has never shown himself to be a petrologist. That is a rock expert, not of the music kind, according to this Wikipedia link. (Hmm... I wonder what do they call someone who studies petrol?) However, as YG seems to have been all over our little island of late, he must have seen this rock before. So YG, what's your answer?

As for me, I am no rock expert myself. I only know how to talk rocks. :p

Answer To Quiz - Updated on 26 Dec 2008

YG, Chun See and Icemoon obviously knew the answer to the quiz right away but they didn't want to spoil the game for the rest. Yes, the answer is Bukit Timah Summit.

graphic myspace at Gickr.com

The inscription says:
Bukit Timah Summit
Ht. 163.63m
Lat. N 1 deg 21' 16.85"
Long. E 103 deg 46' 34.95"
The climb to the summit is about half an hour to one hour, depending on how fast you climb. If you do it slowly, the walk can be quite romantic.


A tree trunk with a heart-shaped cross section. Ain't it lovely?


Take your time to see nature at its best. You can admire the long-tailed macaques but don't feed them. Your act may hurt your pocket more than their hunger may hurt them. ;) But more importantly, feeding the macaques will alter their feeding habits and make them associate human beings with food. They become reliant on us for food and may even turn aggressive if they don't get what they want. In fact, I witnessed a macaque snatching a plastic bag containing a water bottle from an unwary woman. It was quite scary.


The last part of the climb is a flight of stairs. This is a shortcut. If you take the road, the climb is less steep but it is further, naturally (pun intended).

After an arduous climb (for people of my age), I finally reached the summit.


If you are lucky, you might even see some unusual sights. On the day I was there, Mediacorp was filming on location.


The man in pink shirt was Director Michael Woo.


Come on. If Michael Woo I can make it to the summit, surely you can too. Make an attempt, if you haven't. I'm sure you will not regret it.

The Bukit Timah Summit


At the Bukit Timah Summit, there is a sign that reads:
"You have reached the top of Singapore's highest natural point at 163.8 metres. The first men to reach the summit was Singapore's Resident Councillor John Prince and his contractors in June 1827.

It took them five hours to cover a distance of 22.5 kilometres of plantations, hills and swamps from the south. A white flag was hoisted up the tallest tree, which could be seen from as far as Fort Canning Hill. The access road to the summit was built in 1843.

Believe it or not! Once upon a time .... where the tigers roamed. 'Bukit Timah was known to be horrid tiger-infested, forested blob to the early Colonials where tiger roars can be heard at twilight.' - A View From The Summit"
Battle For Bukit Timah

The inscription on the plaque near the Visitor Centre reads as follows:
"Bukit Timah, which dominates the arterial Bukit Timah and Dunearn Roads leading to the city, was a strategically important point for both the Allied troops and the Japanese.

On the night of 10th February 1942, the Japanese troops from the 5th and 18th Divisions, supported by armour, attacked troops of the 12th and 15th Indian Brigades, the 22nd Australian Brigade, The Special Reserve Battalion, Tomforce, Merrett's Force, the Argylls, Jind State Infantry and 'X' Battalion. The Allied forces had re-grouped to defend the critical junctions at Choa Chu Kang, Jurong and Clementi Roads leading to Bukit Timah Road.

By dawn of 11th February 1942, the Japanese troops reported to their commander Lieutenant General Tomoyuki Yamashita that they had seized Bukit Timah. The road to the city was open."

06 October 2007

Our Founder Has A Change Of Name

We all know that our founder is Sir Stamford Raffles.


He founded Singapore in 1819.


Therefore, I am surprised to read in today's Zao Bao that he has a change of name. But relax, only his Chinese name will be changed - from 莱佛士 to 来福士.

CapitaLand, which owns Raffles City Singapore, is behind the name change. The reason why Raffles City Singapore is named as such is because it stands on the original Raffles Institution (RI) site. (RI was demolished to make way for Raffles City.) Sir Stamford Raffles had personally chosen this RI site in 1823. So the name Raffles City was adopted in commemoration of him.

This name change came about mainly because of CapitaLand's expansion overseas, particularly in Shanghai. Shanghai's regulations do not allow a building to have the Chinese character 佛 (Buddha) as part of its name. Neither are foreigners' names allowed.

As if in support of the change, the newspaper article mentioned that places in Singapore like Lavender and Bendemeer had their names changed some time ago as well. It further mentioned that Colonel William Farquhar (Sir Stamford Raffles' right-hand man) had his name translated into different Chinese versions which sounded similar as well. The CEO of CapitaLand, Mr Liew Mun Leong said that the two Chinese versions of Raffles' name were only slightly different. He further mentioned that the new name had a more modern and auspicious meaning, as it meant "bringing in prosperity". The old name was deemed to belong to history and obsolescence.

What do you think of the name change? Do you think that it is justified because of commercial reasons? Will we lose part of our Singaporean identity because of this name change?

What if one day, someone decided to change Raffles to Rapheus for the same reasons? They sound alike too.

The Zao Bao article is reproduced below:

“莱佛士”过时了?

● 洪艺菁angyc@sph.com.sg

龙国雄(摄)

  你能够从“来福士”三个字,联想到新加坡历史吗?

  本地的东南亚最大房地产开发商嘉德置地公司为了统一国际品牌,连同新加坡的“莱佛士城”也一并改名为“来福士城”,是要让人知道它同中国的“来福士广场”、“来福士中心”等都是血脉相承的亲兄弟。

  在嘉德置地总裁廖文良眼里,这两者只是“稍微不同而已”。可是,差别就在于“莱佛士”三个字是新加坡开埠者史丹福·莱佛士的名字,具有非凡的历史意义,而来福士城所坐落的地点,也是百年学堂莱佛士书院让出来的。“来福士”这三个字,却不能让人联想到什么。

  这座地标建筑物的历史与“莱佛士”这名字有着不解之缘。1823年,莱佛士亲自选择在这块地上为新加坡第一所学校莱佛士书院奠下基石,它现在也成了新加坡的一流学府。当政府要重新发展市中心时,在那里伫立了150年的书院于是“让位”,因此把这座商业城取名为“莱佛士城”,以纪念这段历史。

  然而,对于是否该保持这座建筑和历史人物莱佛士之间的渊源,嘉德置地公司的看法却很不同,认为来福士这个名称有更好的现代意义,而“莱佛士那个名称则属于历史,已经过时了”。

  究竟是“莱佛士”这三个字缺乏现代意义,还是这段历史渊源不够重要呢?只要英文名称保持不变,华文名称是否保留,真的没关系吗?

改名是在撕裂历史

  在新加坡,历史地标被改名,已经不是第一次了。例如Bendemeer早期原称为“明丽园”。明丽园是19世纪潮州华侨领袖佘连城的私人大庄园,当年暹罗王国(今泰国)的国王拉玛五世到新加坡观光访问时,佘连城还在明丽园设宴“恭候圣驾”。如今把路名音译改为“明地迷亚路”,根本无法让人跟“明丽园”这段历史联想在一起,实际上是割裂历史。

  劳明达街一带本是沼泽地,臭气熏天,殖民地政府给它取了个美丽的名字叫Lavender,乃“薰衣草”之意,希望借此名“压住异味”,但是现在的华文街名却完全没反映出这个意思,当然也错失了让这个背景故事留芳百世的机会。
  这些只是新加坡人失掉历史记忆的许许多多例子中的小部分。

  当英文名称翻译成华文的过程中,出现数个版本并不稀奇。莱佛士的助理William Farquhar的译名就曾先后出现“法古哈、法奇尔、法夸尔”等不同版本。此君于1819年至1823年间是首任英国驻扎行政官,代表莱佛士实际管理新加坡,贡献不在他之下,可惜多数新加坡人对新加坡开埠初期历史的记忆,似乎只停留在一个莱佛士身上。若说起Farquhar,一些人也许还有印象,但如果提起他的华文译名,这位名字被改来改去的先驱人物,更是没在许多人脑海中留下印象。

  Stamford Raffles比他的助理幸运多了。记忆中,他的译名始终只有“莱佛士”,从未出现其他版本。反而是国家名称“新加坡”,殖民地时代曾有人写为“星加坡”、“星嘉坡”、“新嘉坡”等,国家独立后,政府成立了统一译名委员会,才将国名统一为“新加坡”。

  “莱佛士”三个字在国际上响当当,以它命名的包括了著名学府、商业集团、医院、酒店等等。这三个字如今已经几乎等同于新加坡的优良品质保证。因此,一些机构即使跟它没什么历史渊源,也爱套上“莱佛士”三个字,以沾一份光。虽然莱佛士逝世已有两个世纪,但他的名字在现代社会的“重量”和“价值”却未减弱。

  全球懂得华文的人越来越多,许多人已能够直接阅读汉字,不纯粹只靠汉语拼音,因此“莱佛士”和“来福士”是两个截然不同的名字。倘若真是一样,嘉德置地就不必为了统一形象,而将“莱佛士城”改为“来福士城”了。

  可是,嘉德置地在上海的商场,原本是逼于无奈,受限于当地建筑物命名条例而无法出现“佛”字,也不准使用外国人的名字,而不得不改用“来福士”这三个近音字取代,这确实令人遗憾。称之为“广场”而不是“城”,也是基于当地的条例。

  现在反过来在发源地用“来福士城”来取代新加坡人和国际社会所熟悉的“莱佛士城”,强迫新加坡人接受一个陌生的名字,是否本末倒置呢?

  吊诡的是,嘉德置地公司的名称在新加坡和中国也各有不同版本。因为中国原已有一家称为“嘉德”的公司,它在中国登记设立的全资子公司,也不得不改称“凯德置地”,但是它却不打算将公司的华文名称统一为“凯德置地”。如果“嘉德”两个字值得保留,那“莱佛士”为什么却可以摒弃?

  廖文良认为“来福士”三个字有更好的现代意义,也喜欢那个“福”字。可是招财招福的商标,许多商家都可以自创和拥有,但有个历史悠久的名称,却是许多机构求之不得的,如今嘉德置地却自动弃权了。

  在面向世界的时候,选择放弃具有历史意义的华文旧名称,是想要卸下历史包袱以便展翅高飞,还是认为“华文对于走向世界并不重要”?一家不重视具有历史意义的名称的公司,又为我们的后代树立什么样的榜样?

  接下来,嘉德置地将把这个“新加坡制造”的“城中城”概念带到世界各地,让世界其他角落留下新加坡的足迹。可是,如果对嘉德置地来说,“莱佛士”和“来福士”发音相近,只是“稍微不同而已”,那么在世界各地留下足迹的,究竟还是不是“新加坡”?